Intraoperative Evaluation of the HeartMate II Flow Estimator

Background Direct measurement of blood flow output has been incorporated into ventricular assist devices (VADs), but long-term reliability of the additional device components has raised concerns regarding sensor drift and failure. As an alternative approach, the HeartMate II axial VAD (Thoratec Corp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of heart and lung transplantation 2009, Vol.28 (1), p.39-43
Hauptverfasser: Slaughter, Mark S., MD, Bartoli, Carlo R., MLA, Sobieski, Mike A., CCP, Pantalos, George M., PhD, Giridharan, Guruprasad A., PhD, Dowling, Robert D., MD, Prabhu, Sumanth D., MD, Farrar, David J., PhD, Koenig, Steven C., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Direct measurement of blood flow output has been incorporated into ventricular assist devices (VADs), but long-term reliability of the additional device components has raised concerns regarding sensor drift and failure. As an alternative approach, the HeartMate II axial VAD (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) estimates device flow output from power consumption and rotational speed of the device motor. This study evaluated the accuracy of HeartMate II flow estimation at the time of implantation. Methods In 20 patients, intraoperative blood flow measurement of the HeartMate II flow estimator was compared with flow values obtained with an ultrasonic flow probe placed around the device outflow graft. Estimated and measured VAD flow data were simultaneously recorded and digitally stored while the device motor speed varied from 7,800 to 11,000 rpm and while achieving device flow outputs of 2 to 7 liters/min. Estimated and measured flows were compared using linear regression analyses and root mean square error. Results HeartMate II flow estimation (FE) demonstrated a linear correlation with ultrasonic flow probe (FP) measurements: FE = 0.74 FP + 0.99 ( R2 = 0.56, p = 0.0001). A root mean square error of 0.8 liters/min was observed between flow estimation and direct flow measurement and suggests a 15% to 20% difference at flows of 4 of 6 liters/min. Conclusions These results suggest that HeartMate II flow estimation may be used to provide directional information for trend purposes rather than absolute values of device blood flow output. Patient management should include but not be limited to this information.
ISSN:1053-2498
1557-3117
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2008.10.007