The effect of grade of anaesthetist on outcome after day surgery

Summary We conducted a retrospective survey to investigate if the grade of anaesthetist was a significant factor in determining outcome after day surgery in a district general hospital. All day surgery procedures performed between 1996 and 2006 were included except those under surgically administere...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia 2009-02, Vol.64 (2), p.152-155
Hauptverfasser: Hanousek, J., Stocker, M. E., Montgomery, J. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary We conducted a retrospective survey to investigate if the grade of anaesthetist was a significant factor in determining outcome after day surgery in a district general hospital. All day surgery procedures performed between 1996 and 2006 were included except those under surgically administered local anaesthetic. The outcome measures assessed were unplanned admissions and symptoms reported after discharge. The overall admission rate was 2.6%, the admission rate for anaesthetic‐related reasons was 1.5%, and 49% of patients reported some symptoms after discharge. Over the period studied the admission rate fell from 4.2% to 2.0%, admissions for anaesthetic‐related reasons fell from 3.0% to 0.7% and reported symptoms fell from 67% to 37%. Consultants anaesthetists were associated with the lowest unplanned admission rate (consultants 2.3%, staff grade and associate specialists 3.1%, and trainees 3.3%), the lowest admission rate for anaesthetic reasons (consultants 1.2%, staff and associate specialists 2.0%, and trainees 1.8%), lower than expected specialty‐weighted admissions and the lowest number of reported symptoms (consultants 47.3%, staff grade and associate specialists 52.6%, trainees 49.0%) (p 
ISSN:0003-2409
1365-2044
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05730.x