Which Method Should We Select for Pancreatic Anastomosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Background This study was designed to compare surgical, morphological, and functional outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) according to the types of pancreaticoenterostomy performed and to suggest a proper anastomotic method after PD. Methods From January 2001 to December 2006, 147 PDs were perf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of surgery 2009-02, Vol.33 (2), p.326-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Ji Hun, Yoo, Byung Moo, Kim, Jin Hong, Kim, Wook Hwan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background This study was designed to compare surgical, morphological, and functional outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) according to the types of pancreaticoenterostomy performed and to suggest a proper anastomotic method after PD. Methods From January 2001 to December 2006, 147 PDs were performed at Ajou University Medical Center. Surgical, morphological, functional, and nutritional outcomes after PD were retrospectively compared according to the types of management of pancreatic remnant and whether pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), including duct-to-mucosa or invagination method, was performed. Results For the reconstruction method, 43 PG (30 duct-to-mucosa and 13 invagination) and 100 PJ (33 duct-to-mucosa and 67 invagination) were performed. Pancreatic leak rate in PG group (7%) was less than that in PJ group (13%); however, it was not significant ( P  > 0.05). On the other hand, there was a significant difference in pancreatic leak between duct-to-mucosa and invagination (3.2 vs. 17.5%, P  
ISSN:0364-2313
1432-2323
DOI:10.1007/s00268-008-9827-y