Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the thrombopoietin‐receptor gene, but not the thrombopoietin gene, with differences in platelet count

Little is known about the mechanisms explaining the wide variation in platelet counts (PLT) and other hematologic parameters in humans. We previously showed that the sex‐based difference in hematocrit was associated with nucleotide variation in the erythropoietin receptor gene (EPOR). We sought to i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hematology 2004-09, Vol.77 (1), p.12-21
Hauptverfasser: Zeng, She Min, Murray, Jeffrey C., Widness, John A., Strauss, Ronald G., Yankowitz, Jerome
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Little is known about the mechanisms explaining the wide variation in platelet counts (PLT) and other hematologic parameters in humans. We previously showed that the sex‐based difference in hematocrit was associated with nucleotide variation in the erythropoietin receptor gene (EPOR). We sought to identify new polymorphisms of the human thrombopoietin (TPO) and thrombopoietin receptor (TPOR) genes to determine any associations with blood PLT counts. We screened TPO and TPOR for polymorphisms using single‐strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and DNA sequencing. Association of polymorphisms was studied in 304 normal subjects with low or high PLT counts. Distribution of allelic frequency was analyzed by the Chi‐square statistic. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with two alleles were found in TPO and TPOR. The TPO SNP was a G to A transition at nucleotide 5753, and the TPOR SNP was a C to A transversion at position 550 in the 5′‐promoter area. The allelic frequencies were 0.54 for G and 0.46 for A of TPO, and 0.62 for C and 0.38 for A of TPOR in a Caucasian population. The frequency of the TPOR allele “C” was significantly higher in subjects with high PLT count (>258 k/mm3) versus low PLT count (258 k/mm3) versus males with low PLT count (
ISSN:0361-8609
1096-8652
DOI:10.1002/ajh.20095