Effect of long-term estrogen therapy on dopaminergic responsivity in post-menopausal women—a preliminary study
Females have a higher prevalence than men of neuropsychiatric disorders in which dopaminergic abnormalities play a prominent role, e.g. very late-onset schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The biological basis of these sex differences is unknown but may include modulation of the dopaminergic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychoneuroendocrinology 2004-11, Vol.29 (10), p.1309-1316 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Females have a higher prevalence than men of neuropsychiatric disorders in which dopaminergic abnormalities play a prominent role, e.g. very late-onset schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The biological basis of these sex differences is unknown but may include modulation of the dopaminergic system by sex hormones, as there is preliminary evidence that estrogen modulates treatment response in these disorders. Furthermore, sex differences in dopamine-mediated cognitive decline suggest estrogen may also play a role in healthy aging. However, the effects of estrogen on the dopaminergic system are poorly understood, and nobody has examined the effect of long-term estrogen therapy (ET) on this system. We compared dopaminergic responsivity (growth hormone (GH) response to apomorphine) in post-menopausal women on ET to women who were ET-naïve. GH response to subcutaneous apomorphine (0.005 mg/kg) was measured in two groups of healthy post-menopausal women aged between 55 and 70 years: those taking ET (
n=13) and those who had never taken ET (
n=13). Neither group was taking any other medication. GH was measured at 15 min intervals from −30 min before administration of apomorphine to 90 min post-administration. GH response was measured in two ways: area under the curve (AUC) and maximum response over baseline (GH). There were no between-group differences in demographic or baseline variables. The ET treated women had a significantly greater (
p=0.03) AUC than ET naïve women (mean±S.D.; 5.3±4.7 vs. 2.6±2.3). However, (GH) did not differ significantly between groups (6.1 mU/l±6.2 vs. 2.7 mU/l±S.D.=4.1). Also, analysis of GH response over time revealed a significant main effect of time (
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-4530 1873-3360 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.03.008 |