Smell identification test as an indicator for cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease

Objectives The aim of the present study was to assess olfactory dysfunction in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to compare utility of the olfactory tests as possible clinical markers. Methods Two olfactory identification tests (The Cross‐Cultural Smell Identification Test [CC‐SIT] and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of geriatric psychiatry 2004-08, Vol.19 (8), p.727-733
Hauptverfasser: Suzuki, Y., Yamamoto, S., Umegaki, H., Onishi, J., Mogi, N., Fujishiro, H., Iguchi, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The aim of the present study was to assess olfactory dysfunction in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to compare utility of the olfactory tests as possible clinical markers. Methods Two olfactory identification tests (The Cross‐Cultural Smell Identification Test [CC‐SIT] and the Picture‐based Smell Identification Test [P‐SIT]) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) were administered to patients with AD and age‐matched controls. Apolipoprotein E (Apo E) genotypes of patients with AD were identified. Results Patients with AD had significantly lower olfactory identification scores than age‐matched non‐demented elderly subjects in both olfactory assessments. In the AD group, the coefficient of correlation between the MMSE scores and the P‐SIT scores was higher than that between the MMSE scores and the CC‐SIT scores. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses for both tests indicated that the P‐SIT discriminated AD patients from controls more reliably than did the CC‐SIT. Within AD patients, those who were carrying one or two ApoE ε4 alleles had a higher coefficient of correlation between the MMSE scores and the P‐SIT scores than patients without the ApoE ε4 allele. Conclusions The results suggest that a short and simple non‐lexical olfactory identification test can be useful as a clinical marker of AD appropriate for Japanese elderly population. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:0885-6230
1099-1166
DOI:10.1002/gps.1161