Interlaboratory Comparison of HER-2 Oncogene Amplification as Detected by Chromogenic and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization
Purpose: Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is a new modification of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique for detection of oncogene amplification in archival tumor samples. In CISH, the oncogene probe is detected using a peroxidase reaction, allowing use of transmitted light...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical cancer research 2004-07, Vol.10 (14), p.4793-4798 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is a new modification of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique for detection of oncogene amplification in archival tumor samples. In CISH, the oncogene probe
is detected using a peroxidase reaction, allowing use of transmitted light microscopy. We compared detection of HER-2 / neu amplification by CISH with a Food and Drug Administration-approved two-color FISH test in an interlaboratory setting.
Experimental Design: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 197 breast cancers were analyzed for HER-2 amplification by CISH. Two-color FISH (PathVysion) CISH of 17 centromere was done if the observer considered it necessary
to ascertain amplification status in tumors with borderline HER-2 CISH copy numbers.
Results: Paired CISH/FISH results were available from 192 (97%) of 197 cases, no clear difference in success rates of either method
was observed. Centromere 17 CISH was considered necessary in seven tumors. CISH and two-color FISH results were concordant
in 180 cases (93.8%). There were 92 and 88 tumors found HER-2 amplified and nonamplified, respectively, by both methods. Eight tumors were amplified by CISH but not by FISH, and four
tumors exhibited the opposite condition (kappa coefficient 0.875). In 7 of 12 cases differences between the two methods could
have related to a lack of CISH chromosome 17 information. The remaining cases were explained by difficult histology (ductal
carcinoma in situ , poor representativity, dense lymphocytic infiltration, or intratumoral heterogeneity).
Conclusions: These results indicate that CISH could provide an accurate and practical alternative to FISH for clinical diagnosis of HER-2/neu
oncogene amplification in archival formalin-fixed breast cancer samples. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-0432 1557-3265 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0428-03 |