Type I IFN Protects Against Murine Lupus
Both the type I (IFN-alpha beta) and type II (IFN-gamma) IFNs have been heavily implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. To test the relative roles of these systems, congenic lupus-prone MRL/CD95(lpr/lpr) (MRL/lpr) mice lacking the type I IFN receptor (IFN-RI), type II IFN rec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of immunology (1950) 2004-08, Vol.173 (3), p.2134-2142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Both the type I (IFN-alpha beta) and type II (IFN-gamma) IFNs have been heavily implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. To test the relative roles of these systems, congenic lupus-prone MRL/CD95(lpr/lpr) (MRL/lpr) mice lacking the type I IFN receptor (IFN-RI), type II IFN receptor (IFN-RII), or both, were derived. As expected, deficiency for IFN-RII protected MRL/lpr mice from the development of significant autoimmune-associated lymphadenopathy, autoantibodies, and renal disease. However, deficiency for the IFN-RI surprisingly worsened lymphoproliferation, autoantibody production, and end organ disease; animals doubly deficient for IFN-RI and IFN-RII developed an autoimmune phenotype intermediate between wild-type and IFN-RII-deficient animals, all correlating with an ability of type I IFN to suppress MRL B cell activation. Thus, type I IFNs protect against both the humoral and end organ autoimmune syndrome of MRL/lpr mice, independent of IFN-gamma. These findings warrant caution in the use of type I IFN antagonists in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and suggest further investigation into the interplay between the types I and II IFNs during the ontogeny of pathogenic autoantibodies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-1767 1550-6606 |
DOI: | 10.4049/jimmunol.173.3.2134 |