Why Distinctive Information Reduces False Memories: Evidence for Both Impoverished Relational-Encoding and Distinctiveness Heuristic Accounts

Two accounts explain why studying pictures reduces false memories within the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm ( J. Deese, 1959 ; H. L. Roediger & K. B. McDermott, 1995 ). The impoverished relational-encoding account suggests that studying pictures interferes with the encoding of relational info...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2004-07, Vol.30 (4), p.787-795
Hauptverfasser: Hege, Amanda C. G, Dodson, Chad S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two accounts explain why studying pictures reduces false memories within the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm ( J. Deese, 1959 ; H. L. Roediger & K. B. McDermott, 1995 ). The impoverished relational-encoding account suggests that studying pictures interferes with the encoding of relational information, which is the primary basis for false memories in this paradigm. Alternatively, the distinctiveness heuristic assumes that critical lures are actively withheld by the use of a retrieval strategy. When participants were given inclusion recall instructions to report studied items as well as related items, they still reported critical lures less often after picture encoding than they did after word encoding. As the impoverished relational-encoding account suggests, critical lures appear less likely to come to mind after picture encoding than they do after word encoding. However, the results from a postrecall recognition test provide evidence in favor of the distinctiveness heuristic.
ISSN:0278-7393
1939-1285
DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.787