Increased Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation with a Gender-Specific Weight Formula

Objective: To test whether Schild’s sex-specific formula for estimating fetal weight is more accurate than commonly used regression formulae. Methods: The gender-specific formula and 10 widely used equations were evaluated in a group of 989 pregnancies. Each fetus underwent ultrasound examination wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fetal diagnosis and therapy 2008-01, Vol.24 (4), p.321-326
Hauptverfasser: Siemer, Jörn, Wolf, Tanja, Hart, Nicola, Schrauder, Michael, Meurer, Britta, Goecker, Tamme, Beckmann, Matthias W., Schild, Ralf L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To test whether Schild’s sex-specific formula for estimating fetal weight is more accurate than commonly used regression formulae. Methods: The gender-specific formula and 10 widely used equations were evaluated in a group of 989 pregnancies. Each fetus underwent ultrasound examination with complete biometric parameters within 7 days before delivery. Results: Over the whole weight range and in the subgroup of newborns with a birth weight between 2,500 and 3,999 g, the sex-specific weight formula from Schild demonstrated the best level of accuracy. For infants with a birth weight of less than 2,500 g as well as for macrosomic newborns, the gender-specific formula did not improve fetal weight estimation. Conclusion: In pregnancies where fetal gender is known, Schild’s regression formula should be used when fetal weight lies within the range of 2,500–3,999 g.
ISSN:1015-3837
1421-9964
DOI:10.1159/000159777