Language use in public health

Doublethink can mislead even experienced public-health practitioners. An example is the term "post-eradication immunization policy" for poliomyelitis.2 It describes preventive strategies, such as routine immunisation with inactivated polio vaccine in low-income and middle-income countries,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 2004-06, Vol.363 (9427), p.2190-2191
Hauptverfasser: Razum, Oliver, Mittal, Onkar, Priya, Ritu, Nayar, KR, Sathyamala, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Doublethink can mislead even experienced public-health practitioners. An example is the term "post-eradication immunization policy" for poliomyelitis.2 It describes preventive strategies, such as routine immunisation with inactivated polio vaccine in low-income and middle-income countries, which will have to be implemented once the eradication of poliomyelitis has been achieved.3 "Eradication", as defined by WHO, is the "achievement of a status whereby no further cases of a disease occur anywhere, and continued control measures are unnecessary".4 By definition, in a post-eradication scenario, there will be no further need for any strategy against either poliomyelitis or poliovirus. In short, there is no such thing as a "post-eradication immunization policy".
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16516-1