A multi-centre evaluation of the intra-assay and inter-assay variation of commercial and in-house anti-cardiolipin antibody assays

To assess the intra-assay (intra-run) and inter-assay (inter-run) variation of commercial and in-house IgG and IgM anti-cardiolipin antibody (aCL) assays/kits, and to determine an appropriate maximum value for inclusion in consensus guidelines. Frozen aliquots of two patient specimens and one commer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pathology 2004-04, Vol.36 (2), p.182-192
Hauptverfasser: Wong, Richard C.W., Favaloro, Emmanuel J., Pollock, Wendy, Wilson, Robert J., Hendle, Michelle J., Adelstein, Stephen, Baumgart, Karl, Homes, Paul, Smith, Stuart, Steele, Richard H., Sturgess, Allan, Gillis, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess the intra-assay (intra-run) and inter-assay (inter-run) variation of commercial and in-house IgG and IgM anti-cardiolipin antibody (aCL) assays/kits, and to determine an appropriate maximum value for inclusion in consensus guidelines. Frozen aliquots of two patient specimens and one commercial control were sent to nine laboratories for the evaluation of eight commercial kits and one in-house assay. Intra-assay and inter-assay evaluations were performed with all three samples for IgG aCL, and one patient specimen for IgM aCL. The IgG and IgM aCL values varied considerably between the nine assays/kits. The majority of assays/kits demonstrated less than 20% intra-assay and inter-assay variation, with lower intra-assay and inter-assay variation observed with the commercial control. Single calibrator assays were not consistently associated with higher interassay variation than multi-point calibrator assays. An inter-assay coefficient of variation of 20% was determined to be an appropriate maximum value for inclusion in the Australasian aCL Working Party consensus guidelines. Improved standardisation between different assay/kits is still required.
ISSN:0031-3025
1465-3931
DOI:10.1080/00313020410001672037