Predictive Factors and Long-Term Outcome of Respiratory Failure after Guillain-Barré Syndrome

To analyze predictive factors and long-term recovery in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) who are in need of mechanical ventilation. In this 15-year retrospective study, 77 adult patients were identified with GBS. A comparison was made between the clinical data from patients who required m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of the medical sciences 2004-06, Vol.327 (6), p.336-340
Hauptverfasser: Cheng, Ben-Chung, Chen, Jin-Bor, Tsai, Chien-Yu, Hsu, Kuo-Tai, Chang, Wen-Neng, Chang, Chen-Sheng, Tsai, Nai-Wen, Lu, Cheng-Hsien, Chang, Chin-Jung, Hung, Pi-Lien, Wang, Kuo-Wei, Chang, Hsueh-Wen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To analyze predictive factors and long-term recovery in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) who are in need of mechanical ventilation. In this 15-year retrospective study, 77 adult patients were identified with GBS. A comparison was made between the clinical data from patients who required mechanical ventilation and those who did not. Furthermore, the therapeutic outcomes of those 25 patients in need of mechanical ventilation during hospitalization at 1 year were determined using a modified Barthel index. A score below 12 was defined as a poor outcome, whereas a score of 12 or more was good. The study revealed 32% of patients (25/77) in need of respiratory support during hospitalization. At a follow-up of 1 year among the 25 ventilated patients, 7 patients (28%) had normal or minor signs and symptoms, 6 had unassisted gait, 3 had assisted gait, 6 were wheelchair- or bed-bound, and 3 died. The cause of death was septicemia with septic shock in all 3 cases. Factors that predict respiratory failure in the study GBS patients were disability grade on admission and areflexia. Those ventilated patients who had low maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) (
ISSN:0002-9629
1538-2990
DOI:10.1097/00000441-200406000-00007