Faculty Members’ Perceptions of How Academic Work is Evaluated: Similarities and Differences by Gender
A questionnaire about how academic performance is evaluated and the importance of teaching and research was completed by 265 faculty at a UK research university. Factor analysis followed by t -tests showed that male faculty had a more realistic understanding of how their research is evaluated, rate...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Sex roles 2008-12, Vol.59 (11-12), p.765-775 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 775 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11-12 |
| container_start_page | 765 |
| container_title | Sex roles |
| container_volume | 59 |
| creator | Todd, Zazie Madill, Anna Shaw, Nicky Bown, Nicola |
| description | A questionnaire about how academic performance is evaluated and the importance of teaching and research was completed by 265 faculty at a UK research university. Factor analysis followed by
t
-tests showed that male faculty had a more realistic understanding of how their research is evaluated, rate the importance of research to their careers more highly, and are more likely than women to work over hours through choice. Women faculty are more likely than men to work over hours because of teaching workload and rate the importance of a teaching qualification more highly, despite giving similar ratings as men to the importance of teaching to their career. The implications for differential rates of promotion are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11199-008-9480-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61758616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1613639931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-841d71d56ec323854d76c04f41d6cdc88c507de93e71374ed11197425b80e2093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1qFDEYhoNYcF29AM-CoGdj8zOTZDxb2u62UGmhFg9DNvlGs85k1mRG2TNvo7fnlTTDLApCj0LyPd_LkxehN5R8oITI00QpreuCEFXUpSJF_QwtaCV5waRgz9GCcEHylFUv0MuUdoSQvFYu0Le1sWM7HPAn6LYQ05_fD_gWooX94PuQcN_gy_4XXlnjoPMWf-njd-wTvvhp2tEM4D7iO9_51kQ_eEjYBIfPfdNAhGDzfXvAGwgO4it00pg2wevjuUT364vPZ5fF9c3m6mx1XVguxVCokjpJXSXAcsZVVTopLCmb_Cyss0rZikgHNQdJuSzBTf-WJau2igAjNV-i93PuPvY_RkiD7nyy0LYmQD8mLaislKAig2__A3f9GEN204xVXFCleIboDNnYpxSh0fvoOxMPmhI9Fa_n4nUuXk_F68ng3THYJGvaJppgffq7mCVLNZuymUt5FL5C_CfwdPgjAeWSUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225361883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Faculty Members’ Perceptions of How Academic Work is Evaluated: Similarities and Differences by Gender</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Todd, Zazie ; Madill, Anna ; Shaw, Nicky ; Bown, Nicola</creator><creatorcontrib>Todd, Zazie ; Madill, Anna ; Shaw, Nicky ; Bown, Nicola</creatorcontrib><description>A questionnaire about how academic performance is evaluated and the importance of teaching and research was completed by 265 faculty at a UK research university. Factor analysis followed by
t
-tests showed that male faculty had a more realistic understanding of how their research is evaluated, rate the importance of research to their careers more highly, and are more likely than women to work over hours through choice. Women faculty are more likely than men to work over hours because of teaching workload and rate the importance of a teaching qualification more highly, despite giving similar ratings as men to the importance of teaching to their career. The implications for differential rates of promotion are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-0025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11199-008-9480-9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SROLDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Careers ; College Faculty ; Educational psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gender differences ; Gender Studies ; Longitudinal Studies ; Medicine/Public Health ; Original Article ; Perceptions ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sex Differences ; Sex roles ; Social psychology ; Social role. Sex role ; Sociology ; Teacher ; Teacher evaluations ; Teaching ; University research ; Working Hours ; Working Women</subject><ispartof>Sex roles, 2008-12, Vol.59 (11-12), p.765-775</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-841d71d56ec323854d76c04f41d6cdc88c507de93e71374ed11197425b80e2093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-841d71d56ec323854d76c04f41d6cdc88c507de93e71374ed11197425b80e2093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11199-008-9480-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11199-008-9480-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27343,27923,27924,33773,33774,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20948209$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Todd, Zazie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madill, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Nicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bown, Nicola</creatorcontrib><title>Faculty Members’ Perceptions of How Academic Work is Evaluated: Similarities and Differences by Gender</title><title>Sex roles</title><addtitle>Sex Roles</addtitle><description>A questionnaire about how academic performance is evaluated and the importance of teaching and research was completed by 265 faculty at a UK research university. Factor analysis followed by
t
-tests showed that male faculty had a more realistic understanding of how their research is evaluated, rate the importance of research to their careers more highly, and are more likely than women to work over hours through choice. Women faculty are more likely than men to work over hours because of teaching workload and rate the importance of a teaching qualification more highly, despite giving similar ratings as men to the importance of teaching to their career. The implications for differential rates of promotion are discussed.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender Studies</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Medicine/Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Sex roles</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social role. Sex role</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Teacher</subject><subject>Teacher evaluations</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>University research</subject><subject>Working Hours</subject><subject>Working Women</subject><issn>0360-0025</issn><issn>1573-2762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN1qFDEYhoNYcF29AM-CoGdj8zOTZDxb2u62UGmhFg9DNvlGs85k1mRG2TNvo7fnlTTDLApCj0LyPd_LkxehN5R8oITI00QpreuCEFXUpSJF_QwtaCV5waRgz9GCcEHylFUv0MuUdoSQvFYu0Le1sWM7HPAn6LYQ05_fD_gWooX94PuQcN_gy_4XXlnjoPMWf-njd-wTvvhp2tEM4D7iO9_51kQ_eEjYBIfPfdNAhGDzfXvAGwgO4it00pg2wevjuUT364vPZ5fF9c3m6mx1XVguxVCokjpJXSXAcsZVVTopLCmb_Cyss0rZikgHNQdJuSzBTf-WJau2igAjNV-i93PuPvY_RkiD7nyy0LYmQD8mLaislKAig2__A3f9GEN204xVXFCleIboDNnYpxSh0fvoOxMPmhI9Fa_n4nUuXk_F68ng3THYJGvaJppgffq7mCVLNZuymUt5FL5C_CfwdPgjAeWSUw</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Todd, Zazie</creator><creator>Madill, Anna</creator><creator>Shaw, Nicky</creator><creator>Bown, Nicola</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Faculty Members’ Perceptions of How Academic Work is Evaluated: Similarities and Differences by Gender</title><author>Todd, Zazie ; Madill, Anna ; Shaw, Nicky ; Bown, Nicola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-841d71d56ec323854d76c04f41d6cdc88c507de93e71374ed11197425b80e2093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender Studies</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Medicine/Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Sex roles</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social role. Sex role</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Teacher</topic><topic>Teacher evaluations</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>University research</topic><topic>Working Hours</topic><topic>Working Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Todd, Zazie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madill, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Nicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bown, Nicola</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sex roles</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Todd, Zazie</au><au>Madill, Anna</au><au>Shaw, Nicky</au><au>Bown, Nicola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Faculty Members’ Perceptions of How Academic Work is Evaluated: Similarities and Differences by Gender</atitle><jtitle>Sex roles</jtitle><stitle>Sex Roles</stitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>11-12</issue><spage>765</spage><epage>775</epage><pages>765-775</pages><issn>0360-0025</issn><eissn>1573-2762</eissn><coden>SROLDH</coden><abstract>A questionnaire about how academic performance is evaluated and the importance of teaching and research was completed by 265 faculty at a UK research university. Factor analysis followed by
t
-tests showed that male faculty had a more realistic understanding of how their research is evaluated, rate the importance of research to their careers more highly, and are more likely than women to work over hours through choice. Women faculty are more likely than men to work over hours because of teaching workload and rate the importance of a teaching qualification more highly, despite giving similar ratings as men to the importance of teaching to their career. The implications for differential rates of promotion are discussed.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11199-008-9480-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0360-0025 |
| ispartof | Sex roles, 2008-12, Vol.59 (11-12), p.765-775 |
| issn | 0360-0025 1573-2762 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61758616 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Academic Achievement Behavioral Science and Psychology Biological and medical sciences Careers College Faculty Educational psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gender differences Gender Studies Longitudinal Studies Medicine/Public Health Original Article Perceptions Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Sex Differences Sex roles Social psychology Social role. Sex role Sociology Teacher Teacher evaluations Teaching University research Working Hours Working Women |
| title | Faculty Members’ Perceptions of How Academic Work is Evaluated: Similarities and Differences by Gender |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A49%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Faculty%20Members%E2%80%99%20Perceptions%20of%20How%20Academic%20Work%20is%20Evaluated:%20Similarities%20and%20Differences%20by%20Gender&rft.jtitle=Sex%20roles&rft.au=Todd,%20Zazie&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=765&rft.epage=775&rft.pages=765-775&rft.issn=0360-0025&rft.eissn=1573-2762&rft.coden=SROLDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11199-008-9480-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1613639931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225361883&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |