Faculty Members’ Perceptions of How Academic Work is Evaluated: Similarities and Differences by Gender
A questionnaire about how academic performance is evaluated and the importance of teaching and research was completed by 265 faculty at a UK research university. Factor analysis followed by t -tests showed that male faculty had a more realistic understanding of how their research is evaluated, rate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sex roles 2008-12, Vol.59 (11-12), p.765-775 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A questionnaire about how academic performance is evaluated and the importance of teaching and research was completed by 265 faculty at a UK research university. Factor analysis followed by
t
-tests showed that male faculty had a more realistic understanding of how their research is evaluated, rate the importance of research to their careers more highly, and are more likely than women to work over hours through choice. Women faculty are more likely than men to work over hours because of teaching workload and rate the importance of a teaching qualification more highly, despite giving similar ratings as men to the importance of teaching to their career. The implications for differential rates of promotion are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-0025 1573-2762 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11199-008-9480-9 |