Scams Cannot Be Busted: Reply to Woolgar & Cooper

Scams Cannot Be Busted: Reply to Woolgar & Cooper

A reply to a comment by Steve Woolgar & Geoff Cooper (1999) on Joerges's "Do Politics Have Artefacts?" (1999) argues that Woolgar & Cooper misinterpret Joerges's central thesis. Joerges does not set out to disprove Langdon Winner's account of Robert Moses in "Do...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social studies of science 1999-06, Vol.29 (3), p.450-457
1. Verfasser: Joerges, Bernward
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Ambivalence
Built Environment
Computer technology
Contemporary legends
Control theory
Games
Geography
Parables
Political discourse
Protagonists
Responses and Replies
Social Theories
Technology
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A reply to a comment by Steve Woolgar & Geoff Cooper (1999) on Joerges's "Do Politics Have Artefacts?" (1999) argues that Woolgar & Cooper misinterpret Joerges's central thesis. Joerges does not set out to disprove Langdon Winner's account of Robert Moses in "Do Artifacts Have Politics?" (1980) but to suggest that Winner's argument also is an artifact. J. Ferrari
ISSN:0306-3127
1460-3659
DOI:10.1177/030631299029003006