Assessing Mental Health Program Effectiveness: A Comparison of Three Client Follow-Up Methods
In order to assess the advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews, and mailed questionnaires, 1100 clients were randomly assigned to one of these follow-up methods. All participating clients were contacted approximately 180 days after intake using a well-documented...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation review 1983-10, Vol.7 (5), p.635-658 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In order to assess the advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face interviews, telephone
interviews, and mailed questionnaires, 1100 clients were randomly assigned to one of these
follow-up methods. All participating clients were contacted approximately 180 days after
intake using a well-documented treatment outcome measure. Response rates for the
telephone interview and mailed questionnaire were approximately one-half as high as the
face-to-face interview, yet for each method very few client background variables were
related to whether or not clients responded. The mailed questionnaire was least affected by
socially desirable responses, and also cost less to administer than either of the interview
methods. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0193-841X 1552-3926 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0193841X8300700503 |