DEFINING AND AFFORDING CASE MANAGEMENT: RESPONSE TO "DIVERSITY IN CASE MANAGEMENT MODALITIES: THE SUMMIT MODEL"

DEFINING AND AFFORDING CASE MANAGEMENT: RESPONSE TO "DIVERSITY IN CASE MANAGEMENT MODALITIES: THE SUMMIT MODEL"

In a response to Gregory A. Peterson, I. Delores Drone, & Mark R. Munetz's article about case management modalities (1997 [see abstract 97W27859]), it is argued that case management strategies must be thoroughly tested for both usefulness & financial sustainability before they can be re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Community mental health journal 1997-06, Vol.33 (3), p.251-253
1. Verfasser: Tennison, Clifton R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Case management
Community Mental Health
Community support
Delivery Systems
Homeless people
Inventory control
Mental disorders
Mental health
Mental health care
Mental Health Services
Public sector
Rehabilitation
Task analysis
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a response to Gregory A. Peterson, I. Delores Drone, & Mark R. Munetz's article about case management modalities (1997 [see abstract 97W27859]), it is argued that case management strategies must be thoroughly tested for both usefulness & financial sustainability before they can be recommended to the public sector. While caring for the mental health of patients by means of tailored management may appear to be an effective method for treating individuals in different stages of illness & rehabilitation, it is contended that careful outcome research will be required to avoid misdirected use of precious public resources. 9 References. S. Barrera
ISSN:0010-3853
1573-2789
DOI:10.1023/A:1025045729469