Toward a Better Estimate of the Prevalence of Partner Abuse: Adjusting Rates Based on the Sensitivity of the Conflict Tactics Scale

Studies of spousal aggression, such as the national studies typically cited for prevalence rates ( M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles, 1986 ; M. A. Straus, R. J. Gelles, & S. K. Steinmetz, 1980 ), frequently use reports from only one spouse to calculate yearly prevalence. To date, no correction fac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of family psychology 1997-09, Vol.11 (3), p.332-338
Hauptverfasser: Heyman, Richard E, Schlee, Karin A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Studies of spousal aggression, such as the national studies typically cited for prevalence rates ( M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles, 1986 ; M. A. Straus, R. J. Gelles, & S. K. Steinmetz, 1980 ), frequently use reports from only one spouse to calculate yearly prevalence. To date, no correction factor exists to help one estimate what the rates would have been had reports from both spouses been available. In this study, the authors calculate the epidemiological sensitivity of the Conflict Tactics Scale ( M. A. Straus, 1979 ) in clinical and newly married samples and use the sensitivity figures to provide a correction equation. Correction factors are also provided for three previously published studies of interspousal agreement. The equations provided can be used to make rough estimates of the rate of male-to-female aggression when data from only one spouse are available.
ISSN:0893-3200
1939-1293
DOI:10.1037/0893-3200.11.3.332