When Strangers Disagree: Expressive Response Styles and Attitude Change

In an experiment involving students at a small liberal arts college, 26 dyads who either strongly agreed or strongly disagreed on an important value (eg, death penalty attitudes) performed a cooperative task that allowed discovery of their agreement or disagreement. Expressive response styles of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of social behavior and personality 1999-06, Vol.14 (2), p.197-205
Hauptverfasser: Wallace, K, Martin, M, McMillan, S, Mell, M, Nocks, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In an experiment involving students at a small liberal arts college, 26 dyads who either strongly agreed or strongly disagreed on an important value (eg, death penalty attitudes) performed a cooperative task that allowed discovery of their agreement or disagreement. Expressive response styles of the individuals, as well as impressions of their partners, attitude change, & the dyad's unitary or divided approach to the task were observed & coded. As predicted, it was found that disagreeing dyads showed significantly more variability than agreeing dyads in the use of negative response styles & a greater frequency of negative dominant responses. Partner impressions were favorable in both conditions, but disagreeing dyads rated their partners as less open-minded, suggesting awareness of the value difference. Although the task did not require consensus on the value issue, disagreeing dyads evidenced significantly more depolarization of attitude from pre- to posttest. Findings have implications for the development of nonthreatening ways to mitigate strong value differences. 17 References. Adapted from the source document.
ISSN:0886-1641
2168-3263