"Is Media Research Prescientific?": Comments Concerning the Claim That Mass Media Research Is "Prescientific": A Response to Potter, Cooper, and Dupagne
It is argued that the claims made by W. James Potter, Roger Cooper, & Michel Dupagne (see SA 42:4/9407527) that mass media research is prescientific is unwarranted because the authors' criteria, theory, & probability are too narrow & arbitrary for scientific research. Also, their ap...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Communication theory 1995-08, Vol.5 (3), p.273-289 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It is argued that the claims made by W. James Potter, Roger Cooper, & Michel Dupagne (see SA 42:4/9407527) that mass media research is prescientific is unwarranted because the authors' criteria, theory, & probability are too narrow & arbitrary for scientific research. Also, their application of probability sampling is inconsistent with norms of the scientific community. 19 References. V. Wagener |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1050-3293 |