Imputing Missing Data: A Comparison of Methods for Social Work Researchers

Choosing the most appropriate method to handle missing data during analyses is one of the most challenging decisions confronting researchers. Often, missing values are just ignored rather than replaced with a reliable imputation method. Six methods of data imputation were used to replace missing dat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social work research 2006-03, Vol.30 (1), p.19-31
Hauptverfasser: Saunders, Jeanne A., Morrow-Howell, Nancy, Spitznagel, Edward, Doré, Peter, Proctor, Enola K., Pescarino, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Choosing the most appropriate method to handle missing data during analyses is one of the most challenging decisions confronting researchers. Often, missing values are just ignored rather than replaced with a reliable imputation method. Six methods of data imputation were used to replace missing data from two data sets of varying sizes; this article examines the results. Each imputation method is defined, and the pros and cons of its use in social science research are identified. The authors discuss comparisons of descriptive measures and multivariate analyses with the imputed variables and the results of a timed study to determine how long it took to use each imputation method on first and subsequent use. Implications for social work research are suggested.
ISSN:1070-5309
1545-6838
DOI:10.1093/swr/30.1.19