Comparative Organizational Analysis: Sampling and Measurement

Both homogeneous & heterogeneous samples have been compared in organizational research, although some analysts doubt the value of theoretical generalization from analytical results. An examination of heterogeneous organizations (N = 65) of service, manufacturing, & professional types was con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science research 1982-06, Vol.11 (2), p.141-152
Hauptverfasser: Miller, George A, Conaty, Joseph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Both homogeneous & heterogeneous samples have been compared in organizational research, although some analysts doubt the value of theoretical generalization from analytical results. An examination of heterogeneous organizations (N = 65) of service, manufacturing, & professional types was conducted to test the generalizability of measures, using interview data from organizational chief executives, & employing 9 indicators of organizational structure to measure 3 theoretical concepts: differentiation, centralization, & formalization. A maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis was used. Findings confirmed the value of combining a number of indicators within a few theoretical concepts for purposes of generalization. 2 Tables, 1 Figure. D. Dunseath.
ISSN:0049-089X
DOI:10.1016/0049-089X(82)90016-3