Strong ties and scientific literature

Strong ties and scientific literature

Members of two “research clusters” each in social and biological science were asked how they had first learned of work they had cited in recent publications. While scientists can learn of new work via weak ties, they hardly ever did, because, it is argued, (1) a scientist's goal is to find part...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social networks 1982-09, Vol.4 (3), p.225-232
Hauptverfasser: Murray, Stephen O., Poolman, Robert C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Cite/Cites/Cited/Citing/Citation
Literature
Scientist/Scientists
Social network/Social networks/Social networking
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 3
container_start_page 225
container_title Social networks
container_volume 4
creator Murray, Stephen O.
Poolman, Robert C.
description Members of two “research clusters” each in social and biological science were asked how they had first learned of work they had cited in recent publications. While scientists can learn of new work via weak ties, they hardly ever did, because, it is argued, (1) a scientist's goal is to find particularly good work rather than to maximize information about all possibly relevant work and (2) scientists who are strong ties do not necessarily know identical literature.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0378-8733(82)90023-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61074756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0378873382900235</els_id><sourcerecordid>61074756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c42e05e67c19167c61acc2a46fadd16a3ba7344455293ed1150607bf081115a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wMOCKPWwmtl87kWQ4hcUPKjnkGZnJWW7q0kq-O9NW_HgoZeZy_O-zDyEnAK9AgrymjKlS60Ym-jqsqa0YqXYIyPQqi4rANgnoz_kkBzFuKCUSgV6RM5fUhj69yJ5jIXtmyI6j33yrXdF5xMGm1YBj8lBa7uIJ797TN7u716nj-Xs-eFpejsrHatlKh2vkAqUykENeUqwzlWWy9Y2DUjL5lYxzrkQVc2wARBUUjVvqc5HCgtsTC62vR9h-FxhTGbpo8Ousz0Oq2gkUMWVkBmc7ARByXyAFpxm9OwfuhhWoc9vGKhqrpnUUmeKbykXhhgDtuYj-KUN3waoWUs2a4NmbdDoymwkG5FjN9sYZitfHoPZ-HPY-IAumWbwuwt-AKPMf_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1294836868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strong ties and scientific literature</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Murray, Stephen O. ; Poolman, Robert C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Stephen O. ; Poolman, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><description>Members of two “research clusters” each in social and biological science were asked how they had first learned of work they had cited in recent publications. While scientists can learn of new work via weak ties, they hardly ever did, because, it is argued, (1) a scientist's goal is to find particularly good work rather than to maximize information about all possibly relevant work and (2) scientists who are strong ties do not necessarily know identical literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-8733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0378-8733(82)90023-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SONED4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cite/Cites/Cited/Citing/Citation ; Literature ; Scientist/Scientists ; Social network/Social networks/Social networking</subject><ispartof>Social networks, 1982-09, Vol.4 (3), p.225-232</ispartof><rights>1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c42e05e67c19167c61acc2a46fadd16a3ba7344455293ed1150607bf081115a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c42e05e67c19167c61acc2a46fadd16a3ba7344455293ed1150607bf081115a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378873382900235$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27846,27901,27902,33752,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Stephen O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poolman, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><title>Strong ties and scientific literature</title><title>Social networks</title><description>Members of two “research clusters” each in social and biological science were asked how they had first learned of work they had cited in recent publications. While scientists can learn of new work via weak ties, they hardly ever did, because, it is argued, (1) a scientist's goal is to find particularly good work rather than to maximize information about all possibly relevant work and (2) scientists who are strong ties do not necessarily know identical literature.</description><subject>Cite/Cites/Cited/Citing/Citation</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Scientist/Scientists</subject><subject>Social network/Social networks/Social networking</subject><issn>0378-8733</issn><issn>1879-2111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wMOCKPWwmtl87kWQ4hcUPKjnkGZnJWW7q0kq-O9NW_HgoZeZy_O-zDyEnAK9AgrymjKlS60Ym-jqsqa0YqXYIyPQqi4rANgnoz_kkBzFuKCUSgV6RM5fUhj69yJ5jIXtmyI6j33yrXdF5xMGm1YBj8lBa7uIJ797TN7u716nj-Xs-eFpejsrHatlKh2vkAqUykENeUqwzlWWy9Y2DUjL5lYxzrkQVc2wARBUUjVvqc5HCgtsTC62vR9h-FxhTGbpo8Ousz0Oq2gkUMWVkBmc7ARByXyAFpxm9OwfuhhWoc9vGKhqrpnUUmeKbykXhhgDtuYj-KUN3waoWUs2a4NmbdDoymwkG5FjN9sYZitfHoPZ-HPY-IAumWbwuwt-AKPMf_g</recordid><startdate>19820901</startdate><enddate>19820901</enddate><creator>Murray, Stephen O.</creator><creator>Poolman, Robert C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JHMDA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820901</creationdate><title>Strong ties and scientific literature</title><author>Murray, Stephen O. ; Poolman, Robert C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c42e05e67c19167c61acc2a46fadd16a3ba7344455293ed1150607bf081115a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Cite/Cites/Cited/Citing/Citation</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Scientist/Scientists</topic><topic>Social network/Social networks/Social networking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Stephen O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poolman, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 31</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social networks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Stephen O.</au><au>Poolman, Robert C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strong ties and scientific literature</atitle><jtitle>Social networks</jtitle><date>1982-09-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>225-232</pages><issn>0378-8733</issn><eissn>1879-2111</eissn><coden>SONED4</coden><abstract>Members of two “research clusters” each in social and biological science were asked how they had first learned of work they had cited in recent publications. While scientists can learn of new work via weak ties, they hardly ever did, because, it is argued, (1) a scientist's goal is to find particularly good work rather than to maximize information about all possibly relevant work and (2) scientists who are strong ties do not necessarily know identical literature.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0378-8733(82)90023-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-8733
ispartof Social networks, 1982-09, Vol.4 (3), p.225-232
issn 0378-8733
1879-2111
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61074756
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Cite/Cites/Cited/Citing/Citation
Literature
Scientist/Scientists
Social network/Social networks/Social networking
title Strong ties and scientific literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A30%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strong%20ties%20and%20scientific%20literature&rft.jtitle=Social%20networks&rft.au=Murray,%20Stephen%20O.&rft.date=1982-09-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=225-232&rft.issn=0378-8733&rft.eissn=1879-2111&rft.coden=SONED4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0378-8733(82)90023-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61074756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1294836868&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0378873382900235&rfr_iscdi=true