Strong ties and scientific literature

Members of two “research clusters” each in social and biological science were asked how they had first learned of work they had cited in recent publications. While scientists can learn of new work via weak ties, they hardly ever did, because, it is argued, (1) a scientist's goal is to find part...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social networks 1982-09, Vol.4 (3), p.225-232
Hauptverfasser: Murray, Stephen O., Poolman, Robert C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Members of two “research clusters” each in social and biological science were asked how they had first learned of work they had cited in recent publications. While scientists can learn of new work via weak ties, they hardly ever did, because, it is argued, (1) a scientist's goal is to find particularly good work rather than to maximize information about all possibly relevant work and (2) scientists who are strong ties do not necessarily know identical literature.
ISSN:0378-8733
1879-2111
DOI:10.1016/0378-8733(82)90023-5