NATO Defense: The Problem Is Not More Money

ARTICLE POINTS OUT THE SHORTCOMINGS IN CURRENT NATO DEFENSE STRATEGY. WHILE THE U.S. IS STRIVING FOR A MORE CREDIBLE CONVENTIONAL DEFENSE WITH, IT'S ARGUED, AN OUTDATED DOCTRINAL UNDERSTANDING, EUROPEANS STILL BELIEVE A NUCLEAR RESPONSE IS NEEDED AGAINST ANY SERIOUS AGGRESSION. THE PAPER ARGUES...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Policy studies journal 1979-10, Vol.8 (1), p.46-53
1. Verfasser: Canby, Steven L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ARTICLE POINTS OUT THE SHORTCOMINGS IN CURRENT NATO DEFENSE STRATEGY. WHILE THE U.S. IS STRIVING FOR A MORE CREDIBLE CONVENTIONAL DEFENSE WITH, IT'S ARGUED, AN OUTDATED DOCTRINAL UNDERSTANDING, EUROPEANS STILL BELIEVE A NUCLEAR RESPONSE IS NEEDED AGAINST ANY SERIOUS AGGRESSION. THE PAPER ARGUES THAT THERE ARE THREE DISTINCT SOLUTIONS FOR OBTAINING A TRUE CONVENTIONAL NATO DEFENSE AT NO EXTRA COST.
ISSN:0190-292X