NATO Defense: The Problem Is Not More Money
ARTICLE POINTS OUT THE SHORTCOMINGS IN CURRENT NATO DEFENSE STRATEGY. WHILE THE U.S. IS STRIVING FOR A MORE CREDIBLE CONVENTIONAL DEFENSE WITH, IT'S ARGUED, AN OUTDATED DOCTRINAL UNDERSTANDING, EUROPEANS STILL BELIEVE A NUCLEAR RESPONSE IS NEEDED AGAINST ANY SERIOUS AGGRESSION. THE PAPER ARGUES...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Policy studies journal 1979-10, Vol.8 (1), p.46-53 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ARTICLE POINTS OUT THE SHORTCOMINGS IN CURRENT NATO DEFENSE STRATEGY. WHILE THE U.S. IS STRIVING FOR A MORE CREDIBLE CONVENTIONAL DEFENSE WITH, IT'S ARGUED, AN OUTDATED DOCTRINAL UNDERSTANDING, EUROPEANS STILL BELIEVE A NUCLEAR RESPONSE IS NEEDED AGAINST ANY SERIOUS AGGRESSION. THE PAPER ARGUES THAT THERE ARE THREE DISTINCT SOLUTIONS FOR OBTAINING A TRUE CONVENTIONAL NATO DEFENSE AT NO EXTRA COST. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0190-292X |