Model Monopoly and Communication: Systems Theoretical Notes on Democratization
Strategies of democratization in societal and organizational contexts that are aimed at reducing the influence gap merely through increased opportunities for communication are critized. As an alternative to the power-through-communication paradigm, which such strategies seem to be based upon, a powe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta Sociologica 1973-01, Vol.16 (2), p.98-107 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Strategies of democratization in societal and organizational contexts that are aimed at reducing the influence gap merely through increased opportunities for communication are critized. As an alternative to the power-through-communication paradigm, which such strategies seem to be based upon, a power-through-model paradigm is suggested: Models are required in order to utilize information offers and exert and withstand influence. This is illustrated by contrasting the operations of two systems, one of which lacks model resources and thus is completely dependent upon external feedback. The other system may carry out internal trials through simulation, and strengthen its model power through comparisons between real and simulated outcomes. If a model-strong actor and a model-weak actor are coupled in an open information exchange system, the former may be expected to gradually increase his control of the other actor. Offers of information are useful only to the extent that there is model capacity for processing the information offered. Thus a successful transition in the name of democratization to a more open communication structure may freeze -- or even increase -- the influence gap. Independent development of system model resources among the less influentials is required. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-6993 1502-3869 2067-3809 |
DOI: | 10.1177/000169937301600202 |