Is Tullock Correct about Sunday Closing Laws?
In a recently reprinted essay, Gordon Tullock (1980: 671-678) develops the thesis that the acquisition by producers of government sanctioned monopoly privileges rarely leads to higher long run profitability. The gains are short-lived because the monopoly rents often are dissipated. 'The success...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public choice 1984-01, Vol.42 (2), p.197-203 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In a recently reprinted essay, Gordon Tullock (1980: 671-678) develops the thesis that the acquisition by producers of government sanctioned monopoly privileges rarely leads to higher long run profitability. The gains are short-lived because the monopoly rents often are dissipated. 'The successors to the original beneficiaries will not normally make exceptional profits, but, unfortunately, they usually will be injured by cancellation of the original gift' (p. 671). Tullock refers to this as 'the transitional gains trap.' |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0048-5829 1573-7101 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF00124162 |