Enforcing a Shared Morality

It is sometimes objected against J. S. Mill's self-protection principle that, apart from protecting individuals from harm, the law has also the function of enforcing the generally shared morality of a society. H. L. A. Hart distinguishes the arguments for the importance of the shared morality i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ethics 1972-07, Vol.82 (4), p.321-329
1. Verfasser: Ten, C. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It is sometimes objected against J. S. Mill's self-protection principle that, apart from protecting individuals from harm, the law has also the function of enforcing the generally shared morality of a society. H. L. A. Hart distinguishes the arguments for the importance of the shared morality into "the disintegration thesis" & "the conservative thesis." The former maintains that a shared morality prevents society from disintegrating or weakening. The latter, as defined by Hart, claims that "the majority have a right to follow their own moral convictions that their moral environment is a thing of value to be defended from change." This paper examines the conservative thesis of Lord Devlin & Basil Mitchell insofar as the thesis is distinct in their writings from the disintegration thesis. It is argued that ultimately Delvin's thesis is based on a mistaken theory of democracy, & Mitchell's on that "romantic conception of nat'lity" which he rightly deplores in others. AA.
ISSN:0014-1704
1539-297X
DOI:10.1086/291855