Enforcing a Shared Morality
It is sometimes objected against J. S. Mill's self-protection principle that, apart from protecting individuals from harm, the law has also the function of enforcing the generally shared morality of a society. H. L. A. Hart distinguishes the arguments for the importance of the shared morality i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ethics 1972-07, Vol.82 (4), p.321-329 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It is sometimes objected against J. S. Mill's self-protection principle that, apart from protecting individuals from harm, the law has also the function of enforcing the generally shared morality of a society. H. L. A. Hart distinguishes the arguments for the importance of the shared morality into "the disintegration thesis" & "the conservative thesis." The former maintains that a shared morality prevents society from disintegrating or weakening. The latter, as defined by Hart, claims that "the majority have a right to follow their own moral convictions that their moral environment is a thing of value to be defended from change." This paper examines the conservative thesis of Lord Devlin & Basil Mitchell insofar as the thesis is distinct in their writings from the disintegration thesis. It is argued that ultimately Delvin's thesis is based on a mistaken theory of democracy, & Mitchell's on that "romantic conception of nat'lity" which he rightly deplores in others. AA. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-1704 1539-297X |
DOI: | 10.1086/291855 |