Historical Analogies in the Congressional Foreign Policy Process

Some political scientists and historians have argued that lessons from the past, in the form of historical analogies, shape the policy choices of contemporary foreign policymakers. We test this thesis by examining the impact of the Munich and Vietnam analogies on the decisions made by members of Con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of politics 1995-05, Vol.57 (2), p.460-468
Hauptverfasser: Taylor, Andrew J., Rourke, John T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Some political scientists and historians have argued that lessons from the past, in the form of historical analogies, shape the policy choices of contemporary foreign policymakers. We test this thesis by examining the impact of the Munich and Vietnam analogies on the decisions made by members of Congress about U.S. policy toward Iraq during the Persian Gulf crisis of 1991: Our analysis reveals that, contrary to much of the literature on the subject, analogies are mostly utilized merely as post-hoc justifications for policy choices determined by ideology and partisanship and are therefore not independent variables in the policy process.
ISSN:0022-3816
1468-2508
DOI:10.2307/2960316