From Camp David to Wye: Changing Assumptions in Arab-Israeli Negotiations

Over the past 25 years, the negotiating assumptions of Arabs and Israelis have changed in a manner consequential for their negotiating tactics and strategies. This article examines how Arabs and Israelis have perceived the role of the United States in Arab-Israeli negotiations, and how each party vi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The Middle East journal 1999-07, Vol.53 (3), p.379-392
1. Verfasser:	Telhami, Shibley
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Agreements Arab people Arab-Israeli conflict Arabs Bilateralism Cold wars Conflict resolution Diplomatic & consular services Domestic policy Foreign relations Government and politics International agreements International relations-US Israel Israel and the Arab states Jewish-Arab relations Mediation, International Middle East Middle Eastern politics Military tactics Negotiation Negotiations Palestinians Parliamentary system Peace Peace negotiations Perception Perceptions Political parties Presidents Prime ministers Tactics Third-party intervention U.S.A United States War
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Over the past 25 years, the negotiating assumptions of Arabs and Israelis have changed in a manner consequential for their negotiating tactics and strategies. This article examines how Arabs and Israelis have perceived the role of the United States in Arab-Israeli negotiations, and how each party viewed the role of the domestic politics of the other in these negotiations. Specifically, it relates the conduct of the negotiations to the ability of each party to understand and adjust to change in domestic politcs.
ISSN:	0026-3141 1940-3461