Comments on Marcello Truzzi's Paper

M. Truzzi's article (see SA 26:5/J6468) is critically reviewed. Although it is true that skepticism can be exaggerated, it is misleading to believe that the premise that fraud exists without any evidence for it is a claim that stands outside the realm of science. A book by C. E. M. Hansel (1966...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zetetic scholar 1978-11, Vol.1 (2), p.107-108
1. Verfasser: Beauregard, Laurent A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:M. Truzzi's article (see SA 26:5/J6468) is critically reviewed. Although it is true that skepticism can be exaggerated, it is misleading to believe that the premise that fraud exists without any evidence for it is a claim that stands outside the realm of science. A book by C. E. M. Hansel (1966) dealing with a scientific evaluation of ESP reveals that author to be a skeptic who claims fraud exists without any evidence of it. His skepticism is here analyzed, & is shown to uphold the reasonable "burden-of-proof principle." Also, Hansel uncovered defects in the ESP experiments, revealing that the fraud without evidence claim has a place in science. G. Simpson.
ISSN:0741-6229