Comparative Metropolitan Organization: Service Production and Governance Structures in St. Louis (MO) and Allegheny County (PA)
For many observers, a large number of governments in a metropolitan area is thought to equate to “fragmentation,” and fragmentation, to ineffective organization and poor performance. Other observers find a large number of local governments to mean competition and consequent pressures for efficiency....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Publius 1993-01, Vol.23 (1), p.19-40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | For many observers, a large number of governments in a metropolitan area is thought to equate to “fragmentation,” and fragmentation, to ineffective organization and poor performance. Other observers find a large number of local governments to mean competition and consequent pressures for efficiency. The number of local governments, however, is only one dimension of the structure of a metropolitan area. We identify and measure key structural characteristics of “fragmented ” metropolitan areas, employing a comparative study of two metropolitan city-counties: St. Louis Cityand County, Missouri, and Allegheny County (Pittsburgh), Pennsylvania. We argue that these areas, with their many units of local government, “work” by means of integrating structures built by local governments together with county and state governments. Counties, in particular, are a useful focus for study of metropolitan relationships because they often provide the institutional frame within which integrating structures are built. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0048-5950 1747-7107 1747-7107 |
DOI: | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a038053 |