CONTENTING INTERPRETATIONS OF BENTHAM'S UTILITARIANISM

THIS ARTICLE ILLUSTRATES THE CONTOURS OF THE CONTINUING DEBATE OVER BENTHAM'S UTILITARIANISM THROUGH AN ANALYSIS OF THE SECONDARY LITERATURE. IT ASSESSES THE COLLECTIVIST, BEHAVIORALIST, CONSTRUCTIVIST, PANOPTICIST AND PATERNALIST) AND "INDIVIDUALIST" (FACILITATIVE AND LIBERAL) INTERPRETATIONS OF BENTHAM'S THOUGHT, INDICATING WHERE THEY ARE CONSISTENT WITH HIS WRITINGS AND WHERE THEY ARE NOT. DISTINCTIONS AND CONFLICTS BETWEEN CONTENDING PERSPECTIVES ARE FOUND TO BE ROOTED IN A RELIANCE ON DIFFERENT ELEMENTS OF BENTHAM'S VAST CORPUS AND EMPHASIS ON DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF HIS UTILITARIAN THEORY. AN EXAMINATION OF THE CONTENDING PERSPECTIVES UNDERSCORES THE TENSIONS IN BENTHAM'S THOUGHT, INCLUDING THE MOST CHARACTERISTIC TENSIONS BETWEEN, ON THE ONE HAND, THE AXIOMATIC COMMITMENT TO THE INDIVIDUAL AND, ON THE OTHER HAND, THE GREATEST HAPPINESS PRINCIPLE.