Wild resources management in Southern Africa: participation, partnerships, ecoregions and redistribution

In rural southern Africa, access to wild resources is critical to livelihoods & various attempts have been made by policymakers to increase the income derived from them by poor communities. This article examines the existing & emerging institutional arrangements in the tourism/safari hunting...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IDS bulletin (Brighton. 1984) 2003-07, Vol.34 (3), p.31-40
Hauptverfasser: Wolmer, William, Ashley, Caroline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In rural southern Africa, access to wild resources is critical to livelihoods & various attempts have been made by policymakers to increase the income derived from them by poor communities. This article examines the existing & emerging institutional arrangements in the tourism/safari hunting & forestry sectors & assesses their impact on livelihoods. Case studies of wildlife & forestry management initiatives are drawn from the Eastern Cape (South Africa), Chiredzi district (Zimbabwe) & Zambezia province (Mozambique). Four types of initiative are described: community participation, partnerships, or joint ventures between communities & the private sector; & ecoregional conservation & redistributive measures. A key trend is the emergence of a number of policy approaches that seek to link private sector tourism & forestry operations with community or local involvement, usually with an emphasis on "pro-poor" commercial investment. The danger is that these policies will constrain more than they enable poor people's access to resources & income & will benefit local elites, the private sector & the state more than the poor. However, where the state is willing & able to prioritize local issues when trade-offs arise &/or communities have firm legal or de facto rights over land with high commercial value, the new "pro-poor" policies for the management of wild resources do hold out some hope for improving rural livelihoods. 11 References. Adapted from the source document.
ISSN:0265-5012
DOI:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2003.tb00075.x