Beyond Promissory Estoppel: Contract Law and the "Invisible Handshake"

The results of a survey of over 200 promissory estoppel cases decided in the last 10 years are presented. The results document the declining role of reliance in establishing liability and determining remedies. The study indicates that most cases denying recovery, purportedly for lack of reasonable r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The University of Chicago law review 1985-10, Vol.52 (4), p.903-947
Hauptverfasser: Farber, Daniel A., Matheson, John H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The results of a survey of over 200 promissory estoppel cases decided in the last 10 years are presented. The results document the declining role of reliance in establishing liability and determining remedies. The study indicates that most cases denying recovery, purportedly for lack of reasonable reliance, can be readily explained on other grounds. A new rule of promissory liability is emerging from the courts' encounters with an economy in which Okun's (1981) ''invisible handshake'' is increasingly relevant. A rule is proposed as a new standard of enforcement. The proposed rule is that any promise made in furtherance of an economic activity is enforceable. This rule unifies promissory estoppel and other exceptions to the consideration requirement with consideration doctrine itself.
ISSN:0041-9494
1939-859X
DOI:10.2307/1599520