Prudence and Constitutional Rights
In "The Calculus of Consent," Buchanan and Tullock argue for institutional safeguards to ensure maximal benefit for all members of a community against the potential tyranny of the majority. I extend this idea by introducing prudential concerns and argue that they ought to be factored into...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of economics and sociology 2004-01, Vol.63 (1), p.213-256 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In "The Calculus of Consent," Buchanan and Tullock argue for institutional safeguards to ensure maximal benefit for all members of a community against the potential tyranny of the majority. I extend this idea by introducing prudential concerns and argue that they ought to be factored into the decision making that constructs such safeguards. Specifically, I see the safeguarding of prudential concerns for all members of society as a matter that should be secured from the random fate of the political process by constitutional provisions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9246 1536-7150 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2004.00284.x |