Legal Defeats—Political Wins: Why Do Elected Representatives Go to Court?

Why do political parties and politicians turn to litigation instead of using political channels in their efforts to affect public policies? Over the past 20 years, there has been a noticeable trend in which Israeli parties and politicians have turned to the courts for intervention in national and in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative political studies 2005-02, Vol.38 (1), p.75-103
Hauptverfasser: Dotan, Yoav, Hofnung, Menachem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Why do political parties and politicians turn to litigation instead of using political channels in their efforts to affect public policies? Over the past 20 years, there has been a noticeable trend in which Israeli parties and politicians have turned to the courts for intervention in national and internal party affairs, government policies, and even parliamentary procedures. The authors argue that this phenomenon is tied to the growth of open competition within political parties on one hand and reforms in the legal doctrines controlling access to litigation on the other. This study indicates that politicians seek litigation even when their chances of winning in court are marginal. According to the findings, politicians exhibit a lower propensity to seek out-of-court settlements than other kinds of litigants. The results suggest that politicians resort to litigation to challenge majoritarian policies and also because they gain considerable media exposure (regardless of the actual outcome of litigation), enhancing their political stature.
ISSN:0010-4140
1552-3829
DOI:10.1177/0010414004270969