Fuzzy Sets and Social Research
An introduction to a special issue on fuzzy sets presents the four in-depth methodological discussions are an attempt to validate this new methodology which extends Boolean or "crisp" sets by allowing membership scores in the interval between 0 & 1. The inclusion of such dichotomies as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociological methods & research 2005-05, Vol.33 (4), p.423-430 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | An introduction to a special issue on fuzzy sets presents the four in-depth methodological discussions are an attempt to validate this new methodology which extends Boolean or "crisp" sets by allowing membership scores in the interval between 0 & 1. The inclusion of such dichotomies as public vs private or employed vs unemployed helps social scientists to conceptualize social & political occurrences as sets with imprecise boundaries between membership & non-membership. By comparing fuzzy sets to more established approaches, contributors demonstrate the strength of this methodology, especially its ability to permit a more nuanced representation of categorical concepts, address diversity & ambiguity in a systematic way, evaluate set-theoretic relationships, & faithfully translate set-theoretic terms. The four contributions illustrate this methodology's usefulness for both qualitative & quantitative research by highlighting the capacity of fuzzy sets to assign partial membership to cases of sets & to find causal patterns not addressed by established approaches. The limitations of fuzzy sets are examined & a synopsis of each article is included. 9 References. J. Lindroth |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0049-1241 1552-8294 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0049124105274499 |