More Smoke, No Substance: Palmer and Whitten's Defence Fails

More Smoke, No Substance: Palmer and Whitten's Defence Fails

Royed et al respond to Palmer and Whitten's critique of their argument regarding economic voting. They argue that Palmer and Whitten continue their attempt to distract readers from the main issue in this exchange: Is there solid evidence that 'clarity of responsibility' matters for ec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of political science 2003-01, Vol.33 (1), p.160-162
Hauptverfasser: Royed, Terry J., Leyden, Kevin M., Borrelli, Stephen A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Economic Factors
Economic growth models
Economic models
Economics
Methodological Problems
Methodology (Philosophical)
Notes and Comments
Political science
Political Science Research
Scientific progress
Theoretical Problems
Voting
Voting Behavior
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 1
container_start_page 160
container_title British journal of political science
container_volume 33
creator Royed, Terry J.
Leyden, Kevin M.
Borrelli, Stephen A.
description Royed et al respond to Palmer and Whitten's critique of their argument regarding economic voting. They argue that Palmer and Whitten continue their attempt to distract readers from the main issue in this exchange: Is there solid evidence that 'clarity of responsibility' matters for economic voting?
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60655045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4092275</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4092275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j232t-133e751b252ec9642dabc8e96cb29a1240fcc5e86c2c64a819f1a470f14661cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj01LxDAYhIMouK7-Aw_Bg14sJG8-2ogXWV0V1g9YxWNJs2-xtW3WpD347w2sJ0_DMA_DzB6ZcalNBpzDPpkxxvKMg5CH5CjGNtlCFHxGrp98QLru_Rde0mdP11MVRzs4vKKvtusxUDts6MdnM444XER6izWmlC5t08VjclDbLuLJn87J-_LubfGQrV7uHxc3q6wFAWPGhcBc8QoUoDNawsZWrkCjXQXGcpCsdk5hoR04LW3BTc2tzFmdDmjuKjEn57vebfDfE8ax7JvosOvsgH6KpWZaKSZVAs_-ga2fwpC2ldwoITQwnqDTHdTG0YdyG5rehp9SMgOQK_ELWJpZag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195336201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>More Smoke, No Substance: Palmer and Whitten's Defence Fails</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection</source><creator>Royed, Terry J. ; Leyden, Kevin M. ; Borrelli, Stephen A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Royed, Terry J. ; Leyden, Kevin M. ; Borrelli, Stephen A.</creatorcontrib><description>Royed et al respond to Palmer and Whitten's critique of their argument regarding economic voting. They argue that Palmer and Whitten continue their attempt to distract readers from the main issue in this exchange: Is there solid evidence that 'clarity of responsibility' matters for economic voting?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2112</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BPLSBO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Economic Factors ; Economic growth models ; Economic models ; Economics ; Methodological Problems ; Methodology (Philosophical) ; Notes and Comments ; Political science ; Political Science Research ; Scientific progress ; Theoretical Problems ; Voting ; Voting Behavior</subject><ispartof>British journal of political science, 2003-01, Vol.33 (1), p.160-162</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Jan 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4092275$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4092275$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,12832,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Royed, Terry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyden, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borrelli, Stephen A.</creatorcontrib><title>More Smoke, No Substance: Palmer and Whitten's Defence Fails</title><title>British journal of political science</title><description>Royed et al respond to Palmer and Whitten's critique of their argument regarding economic voting. They argue that Palmer and Whitten continue their attempt to distract readers from the main issue in this exchange: Is there solid evidence that 'clarity of responsibility' matters for economic voting?</description><subject>Economic Factors</subject><subject>Economic growth models</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Methodology (Philosophical)</subject><subject>Notes and Comments</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political Science Research</subject><subject>Scientific progress</subject><subject>Theoretical Problems</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><issn>0007-1234</issn><issn>1469-2112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj01LxDAYhIMouK7-Aw_Bg14sJG8-2ogXWV0V1g9YxWNJs2-xtW3WpD347w2sJ0_DMA_DzB6ZcalNBpzDPpkxxvKMg5CH5CjGNtlCFHxGrp98QLru_Rde0mdP11MVRzs4vKKvtusxUDts6MdnM444XER6izWmlC5t08VjclDbLuLJn87J-_LubfGQrV7uHxc3q6wFAWPGhcBc8QoUoDNawsZWrkCjXQXGcpCsdk5hoR04LW3BTc2tzFmdDmjuKjEn57vebfDfE8ax7JvosOvsgH6KpWZaKSZVAs_-ga2fwpC2ldwoITQwnqDTHdTG0YdyG5rehp9SMgOQK_ELWJpZag</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Royed, Terry J.</creator><creator>Leyden, Kevin M.</creator><creator>Borrelli, Stephen A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>More Smoke, No Substance: Palmer and Whitten's Defence Fails</title><author>Royed, Terry J. ; Leyden, Kevin M. ; Borrelli, Stephen A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j232t-133e751b252ec9642dabc8e96cb29a1240fcc5e86c2c64a819f1a470f14661cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Economic Factors</topic><topic>Economic growth models</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Methodology (Philosophical)</topic><topic>Notes and Comments</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political Science Research</topic><topic>Scientific progress</topic><topic>Theoretical Problems</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Royed, Terry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyden, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borrelli, Stephen A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>British journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Royed, Terry J.</au><au>Leyden, Kevin M.</au><au>Borrelli, Stephen A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>More Smoke, No Substance: Palmer and Whitten's Defence Fails</atitle><jtitle>British journal of political science</jtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>160-162</pages><issn>0007-1234</issn><eissn>1469-2112</eissn><coden>BPLSBO</coden><abstract>Royed et al respond to Palmer and Whitten's critique of their argument regarding economic voting. They argue that Palmer and Whitten continue their attempt to distract readers from the main issue in this exchange: Is there solid evidence that 'clarity of responsibility' matters for economic voting?</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1234
ispartof British journal of political science, 2003-01, Vol.33 (1), p.160-162
issn 0007-1234
1469-2112
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60655045
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection
subjects Economic Factors
Economic growth models
Economic models
Economics
Methodological Problems
Methodology (Philosophical)
Notes and Comments
Political science
Political Science Research
Scientific progress
Theoretical Problems
Voting
Voting Behavior
title More Smoke, No Substance: Palmer and Whitten's Defence Fails
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A12%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=More%20Smoke,%20No%20Substance:%20Palmer%20and%20Whitten's%20Defence%20Fails&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Royed,%20Terry%20J.&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=160-162&rft.issn=0007-1234&rft.eissn=1469-2112&rft.coden=BPLSBO&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4092275%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195336201&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4092275&rfr_iscdi=true