More Smoke, No Substance: Palmer and Whitten's Defence Fails

More Smoke, No Substance: Palmer and Whitten's Defence Fails

Royed et al respond to Palmer and Whitten's critique of their argument regarding economic voting. They argue that Palmer and Whitten continue their attempt to distract readers from the main issue in this exchange: Is there solid evidence that 'clarity of responsibility' matters for ec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of political science 2003-01, Vol.33 (1), p.160-162
Hauptverfasser: Royed, Terry J., Leyden, Kevin M., Borrelli, Stephen A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Economic Factors
Economic growth models
Economic models
Economics
Methodological Problems
Methodology (Philosophical)
Notes and Comments
Political science
Political Science Research
Scientific progress
Theoretical Problems
Voting
Voting Behavior
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Royed et al respond to Palmer and Whitten's critique of their argument regarding economic voting. They argue that Palmer and Whitten continue their attempt to distract readers from the main issue in this exchange: Is there solid evidence that 'clarity of responsibility' matters for economic voting?
ISSN:0007-1234
1469-2112