A Comparison of Three Brand Evaluation Procedures

The paper reports an empirical examination of the results, reliability, and validity of three attitude measurement procedures—open-ended, paired comparison, and monadic rating. Significant differences among the three approaches were found in the evaluation of two brands on a number of attitudinal di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public opinion quarterly 1979-07, Vol.43 (2), p.261-270
Hauptverfasser: WIND, YORAM, DENNY, JOSEPH, CUNNINGHAM, ARTHUR
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The paper reports an empirical examination of the results, reliability, and validity of three attitude measurement procedures—open-ended, paired comparison, and monadic rating. Significant differences among the three approaches were found in the evaluation of two brands on a number of attitudinal dimensions with respect to judgment of “both brands are alike” and the evaluation of “brand A vs. brand B.”
ISSN:0033-362X
1537-5331
DOI:10.1086/268516