Parliamentarism versus Presidentialism in the Policy Arena
The long-standing debate between advocates of parliamentary and presidential government has recently focused on questions of policy making and implementation. Does the policy process in systems with fused powers differ in systematic and important ways from separation of powers systems? This review e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative politics 2000-04, Vol.32 (3), p.355-376 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The long-standing debate between advocates of parliamentary and presidential government has recently focused on questions of policy making and implementation. Does the policy process in systems with fused powers differ in systematic and important ways from separation of powers systems? This review essay evaluates six attributes of the policy process—the number of veto players, the site of policy negotiations, the provision of collective goods, accountability, interest group strategies, and delegation to bureaucrats—through three collections of case studies. Many, but not all, of the apparent regular differences between parliamentarism and presidentialism break down because of institutional variation within each governmental type. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0010-4159 2151-6227 |
DOI: | 10.2307/422371 |