The Reform Theory of Punishment

Liberals who accept a reform theory of punishment are often unaware of the conflict which exists between their general aversion to the use of manipulative modes of influence & their willingness to endorse the use of such techniques in dealing with legal offenders. `Manipulation' is justifie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ethics 1960-10, Vol.71 (1), p.49-53
1. Verfasser: Kaufman, Arnold S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Liberals who accept a reform theory of punishment are often unaware of the conflict which exists between their general aversion to the use of manipulative modes of influence & their willingness to endorse the use of such techniques in dealing with legal offenders. `Manipulation' is justified only when the claim to superior wisdom & moral superiority is clear. Though these conditions may be met in the case of children, they are not, normally, satisfied re legal offenders. But, in general, an offender will either have to be forced into treatment, or he will have to be manipulated. Force will be ineffective & unjust; manipulation, unjust. Hence the reform theory of punishment is either ineffective or unjust. These views in no way diminish the case for reform of penal instit's. Nor does It conflict with the desirability of giving prisoners the opportunity voluntarily to seek therapeutic help. AA.
ISSN:0014-1704
1539-297X
DOI:10.1086/291314