The Credibility Factor in Elections: Evidence from Britain's Nationwide Building Society's Vote against Conversion
Why did members of Nationwide Building Society vote against converting to a bank and, by doing so, turn down a £2,000 windfall each? The findings of a survey of Nationwide members show that voters make more sophisticated and calculated choices than previously believed. In the Nationwide case, the vo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public choice 2001-04, Vol.107 (1/2), p.115-133 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Why did members of Nationwide Building Society vote against converting to a bank and, by doing so, turn down a £2,000 windfall each? The findings of a survey of Nationwide members show that voters make more sophisticated and calculated choices than previously believed. In the Nationwide case, the voting decision was a calculation of costs and benefits as well as an evaluation of the likelihood that they would in fact be realised. The inclusion of a likelihood variable, which is based on information and attitude towards risk, provides a more realistic approach to understanding voting in rational choice terms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0048-5829 1573-7101 |
DOI: | 10.1023/A:1010375907602 |