Perceiving Age Discrimination in Response to Intergenerational Inequity

Young (N= 57), middle‐aged (N= 57), and older adults (N= 47) were presented with an editorial that argued in favor of their age group's economic interests (e.g., their privilege was fair; their disadvantage was unfair) or against their age group's economic interests (e.g., their privilege...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of social issues 2005-01, Vol.61 (2), p.321-342
Hauptverfasser: Garstka, Teri A., Hummert, Mary Lee, Branscombe, Nyla R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Young (N= 57), middle‐aged (N= 57), and older adults (N= 47) were presented with an editorial that argued in favor of their age group's economic interests (e.g., their privilege was fair; their disadvantage was unfair) or against their age group's economic interests (e.g., their privilege was unfair; their disadvantage was fair). Participants completed measures of perceived age discrimination, attributions for outcomes, and support for age‐based spending. Unfavorable intergenerational comparisons elicited higher perceived age discrimination in middle‐aged adults, and more support among all age groups for funding to middle‐aged adults compared to favorable comparisons. Young and older adults reported more age discrimination than middle‐aged adults regardless of comparison type. Age group status consequences for responses to the intergenerational conflict debate are discussed.
ISSN:0022-4537
1540-4560
DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00408.x