Unofficial Histories: A Vision of Anthropology from the Margins
Initially given as the Presidential Address at the 100th Meeting of the AAA, this article examines the contributions of women and minority anthropologists who have struggled to gain a place at the center of the discipline. Despite 25 years of scholarship on women and minorities, anthropology needs t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American anthropologist 2004-03, Vol.106 (1), p.126-139 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Initially given as the Presidential Address at the 100th Meeting of the AAA, this article examines the contributions of women and minority anthropologists who have struggled to gain a place at the center of the discipline. Despite 25 years of scholarship on women and minorities, anthropology needs to go further in terms of paying attention to their pioneering efforts and the breadth of their scholarship. The article explores four currently important areas of creativity: (1) the transformation of field research through problem-oriented participant observation and "native anthropology," as exemplified by George Hunt, the young Margaret Mead, and Delmos Jones; (2) the evolution of more dialogical forms of ethnographic writing, as pursued by Elsie Clews Parsons, Gladys Reichard, Ella Deloria, and Zora Neale Hurston; (3) sources of critique, as embodied in the work of Ruth Benedict and Michelle Rosaldo; and (4) forms of activism, engaged in by Anita McGee, Benedict, Mead, and Alfonzo Ortiz. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-7294 1548-1433 |
DOI: | 10.1525/aa.2004.106.1.126 |