Constructing Expertise: In a Third Wave of Science Studies?

Part of a symposium of comments on a discussion paper by H. M. Collins and Robert Evans (2002), "The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience." Collins and Evans's treatment of core-sets as a point of entry is critiqued. This is not to say internalist sociolo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social studies of science 2003-06, Vol.33 (3), p.419-434
1. Verfasser: Rip, Arie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Part of a symposium of comments on a discussion paper by H. M. Collins and Robert Evans (2002), "The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience." Collins and Evans's treatment of core-sets as a point of entry is critiqued. This is not to say internalist sociology of science is itself invalid, but, rather, that a broader sociology vis-a-vis productive arrangements and path dependency would be more fruitful. Such an approach would account for how esoteric sciences take shape in the first place, and how protected spaces for these sciences are nurtured. 41 References.
ISSN:0306-3127
1460-3659
DOI:10.1177/03063127030333006