Does It Take a Village? Privatization, Patterns of Restrictiveness and the Demise of Community
As presently structured, common interest communities -- the promised land of connection & civility -- are destined to disappoint those seeking an authentic sense of community. Finding meaningful solutions to this fundamental paradox is important, because community does matter, & our diminish...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Villanova law review 2002-10, Vol.47 (3), p.553-593 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | As presently structured, common interest communities -- the promised land of connection & civility -- are destined to disappoint those seeking an authentic sense of community. Finding meaningful solutions to this fundamental paradox is important, because community does matter, & our diminishing stocks of "social capital" impose considerable strain on social & legal systems. Understanding more about social capital, norms of generalized reciprocity, & the dynamics of community building sheds new light on common interest community deficiencies & bolsters the resolve to discover creative ways to mend the broken promises of this main staple of suburban & metropolitan development. Relevant community paradigms help to recast the reform dialogue & accompanying legal discourse in terms that facilitate cooperation, compromise, & "self-interest rightly understood.". Adapted from the source document. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0042-6229 |