Multiscriptality in South Asia and language development
The paper raises a few old debates in the field of language development, such as the one between a "free" vs a "monitored" policy, treading of a "known" or a "novel" path of progression, or the cost & consequences of a decision to develop a writing system,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of the sociology of language 2001-01, Vol.2001 (150), p.61-74 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The paper raises a few old debates in the field of language development, such as the one between a "free" vs a "monitored" policy, treading of a "known" or a "novel" path of progression, or the cost & consequences of a decision to develop a writing system, or the sociopolitical factors that may contribute to such multilinguality or multiscriptality. It suggests that so far wrong questions have been raised: eg, whether one is talking about a language or a dialect, or whether the variety of speech has a script, or could it have its own grammar, etc. In raising such questions, one overlooks the fact that both in the developed western communities & in South Asia, different languages employ the same or similar writing systems & yet remain different. The study discusses a few actual cases of plurality & multiscriptality in South Asia & the problems arising out of plurality of scripts. It is argued here that in civil societies, all linguistically minority communities have the right to develop their own languages & choose or create their own writing systems. 22 References. Adapted from the source document. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-2516 1613-3668 |
DOI: | 10.1515/ijsl.2001.036 |